ArticleEmergency medicine international2026
Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Focus on Blood Urea Nitrogen-Based Ratios and Age-Adjusted Shock Index.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Focus on Blood Urea Nitrogen-Based Ratios and Age-Adjusted Shock Index.Emergency medicine international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Rapid risk stratification is crucial in managing upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). This study evaluated the prognostic value of the age-adjusted shock index (ASI), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/haemoglobin ratio and BUN/platelet ratio for predicting adverse clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: This single-centre retrospective observational cohort study included 204 adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) presenting to the emergency department with UGIB between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2022. Patients with oesophageal variceal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal sources, trauma, pregnancy, malignancy, prior diagnosis at another institution or incomplete data were excluded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was the primary statistical method used to determine prognostic performance. Results: Among the 204 included patients, the intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate was 14%, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 5.4%. ROC curve analyses for in-hospital mortality revealed statistically significant predictive capabilities across all evaluated parameters. The BUN/haemoglobin ratio demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.779 at an optimal cut-off of > 8.45, yielding a high negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.26%. The BUN/platelet ratio produced an AUC of 0.747 at a cut-off of > 0.17, with an NPV of 98.32%. Additionally, the ASI achieved an AUC of 0.780 at an optimal cut-off of > 61.72 and an NPV of 98.03%. Conclusion: The ASI, BUN/haemoglobin and BUN/platelet ratios are rapid, inexpensive and easily calculable parameters upon admission. Their notably high NPVs make them effective complementary tools to established scoring systems, aiding clinicians in safely identifying low-risk patients who can be managed in the general ward rather than the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.