Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421741›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Comparing the predictive roles of intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load on learning performance: the mediating effect of IVR self-efficacy in warehouse training.

Yen-Ting Chiang, Jon-Chao Hong, Yu-Ting Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yen-Ting ChiangDepartment of Industrial Education at National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jon-Chao HongInstitute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Ting TuInstitute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: IVR-Warehouse is an immersive virtual reality (IVR) educational game designed to train senior high technical students in warehouse safety, addressing the high incidence of occupational accidents in Taiwan's warehouse environments. The system enables learners to practice hazard identification and safety responses in a realistic, risk-free environment, thereby overcoming the logistical and safety limitations of real-world training. This study examined the relationship between task-specific IVR self-efficacy, extraneous cognitive load (ECL), VR operational cognitive load (OCL), and learning outcome. Methods: Structural equation modeling was applied to data collected from 167 participants. The results showed that task-specific IVR self-efficacy was negatively associated with both ECL and OCL, and that both forms of cognitive burden were negatively associated with learning outcome. Results: Notably, OCL showed a stronger predictive effect than ECL, suggesting that operational demands, such as interface access, controller use, attention maintenance, and action sequencing, posed a greater challenge for learners than general system- or environment-related distractions. These findings highlight the importance of reducing operational burden and supporting learners' task-specific confidence to maximize the effectiveness of IVR-based warehouse safety training. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of managing content difficulty to maximize the effectiveness of IVR-based safety training.

Indexed as

extraneous cognitive load (ECL)immersive virtual reality (IVR)learning outcomeoperational cognitive load (OCL)self-efficacywarehouse safety training

Identifiers

PMID42421741
PMCPMC13341622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.