ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Ingested twin ball magnets in a Nepalese boy: swallowed but not forgotten!
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Swallowed foreign body in children is a common and frequent emergency, with most of them passing through the gut without complications. Ingesting multiple magnets or a magnet along with another metallic object, however, poses a significant risk to the bowel due to potential complications such as obstruction, pressure necrosis, perforation, and fistulation. Case presentation: We report a 5-year-old boy presenting with an alleged history of swallowing twin ball magnets a month prior to presentation, remaining largely asymptomatic until imaging revealed their presence. Acutely, an invasive procedure was avoided by a successful endoscopic retrieval, while close, protracted follow-up showing no complications further reduced the morbidity. Clinical discussion: Swallowed twin magnets may go unnoticed in children, presenting later with varied complications. A high index of suspicion is imperative for diagnosis, while knowledge of the hazards associated with delay can guide the modality of management. Conclusion: Swallowed twin magnets, whenever accessible, can be successfully managed by endoscopic retrieval; however, the possibilities of perforation, bleeding, and bowel fistulation require vigilant observation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.