ReviewApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
Reintroducing community health psychology: A journal-based analysis of the visibility and integration of community-based participatory research.
Review in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reintroducing community health psychology: A journal-based analysis of the visibility and integration of community-based participatory research.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides a collaborative framework for addressing health inequities through equitable partnerships, community engagement, and culturally responsive methods. Although widely used in public health and community psychology, CBPR's visibility within the core publication outlets of health psychology remains unclear. This review, inspired by the 2004 Journal of Health Psychology special issue on Community Health Psychology, examines the extent to which CBPR is represented and integrated within the institutional core of health psychology journals over the past two decades. We systematically searched for CBPR-related terms in 10 health psychology journals (e.g., Applied Psychology: Health and Well-being, Journal of Health Psychology) between 2004 and 2024. From the empirical articles identified, we determined whether CBPR was mentioned, discussed, or substantively implemented. For studies using CBPR methods, we coded engagement with nine core elements (e.g., community involvement in design). Of the 14,084 articles published between 2004 and 2024, 28 empirical articles mentioned CBPR without elaboration (~0.2%), 16 discussed CBPR concepts without implementing participatory methods (~0.1%), and 30 incorporated CBPR methods (~0.2%). Among studies incorporating CBPR, engagement varied considerably: on average, studies included 2.67 CBPR elements (SD = 2.99), with scores ranging from 0 to 8; the largest subset (n = 10; 33.3%) addressed only one element. These findings indicate a marked disconnect between the field's stated commitments to equity and the visibility of participatory approaches within its primary publication infrastructure. We conclude by identifying structural and conceptual factors that may limit CBPR's integration and outlining directions for advancing participatory approaches within health psychology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.