ArticleJMIR aging2026
Association Between Loneliness, eHealth Literacy, and Quality of Life Among Chinese Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Loneliness is a growing public health challenge among older adults and is associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes. The role of eHealth literacy in shaping the relationship between loneliness and quality of life remains unclear. Objective: This study aimed to examine the contributing role of eHealth literacy in moderating the associations between loneliness and quality of life among older adults. Methods: A community-based survey was conducted in 2025 among older adults aged 60 years or older living in northwestern China. A total of 2110 participants were included. Multiple linear regression and interaction models were used to assess associations and moderating effects. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by replacing the outcome variable with depressive symptoms and by performing stratified analyses to assess the robustness of the primary interaction findings. Results: Loneliness showed a consistent negative association with quality of life (β=-0.83, 95% CI -1.18 to -0.49; P<.001). Higher overall eHealth literacy was associated with better quality of life (β=0.41, 95% CI 0.35-0.47; P<.001). Interaction models indicated that higher eHealth literacy was associated with a steeper negative association between loneliness and quality of life (β=-0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.002; P=.04). Sensitivity analyses produced similar results across alternative outcomes and subgroups. Conclusions: Higher loneliness was related to a poorer quality of life. Higher eHealth literacy was associated with a steeper negative association between loneliness and quality of life. These findings suggest that eHealth literacy may function as a double-edged sword in later life. Future research is needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms and to examine how digital health competencies interact with psychosocial vulnerability in shaping older adults' well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.