ArticleAnaesthesia2026
Intensive care decision-making, survival and dying well: a mixed methods study with people who have been intensive care patients.
Article in Anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAdmission to the ICU involves experiential burdens and a risk of a negative dying experience if patients do not survive their critical illness. Many patients who are critically unwell, or their surrogate decision-makers, must decide about accepting ICU treatment without knowing what it is like. People who have been through ICU treatment can provide useful insights into what it might be like to die in ICU and what chance of survival makes ICU treatment acceptable to them.
methodsThis study utilised a mixed methods approach involving questionnaires and semi-structured interviews which were analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach. This was done to provide a deep and rich analysis of how participants' experiences of ICU treatment and end-of-life wishes affected their reflections about what it might be like to die on an ICU, and their willingness to accept ICU treatment again in the future.
resultsTwenty-six people who had experienced ICU as patients were interviewed. Whilst some positive experiences were reported, participants thought the negative experiences associated with ICU made it likely that dying on ICU would be a negative dying experience. Being a patient in an ICU involved a confrontation with mortality, loss of control and total dependence, and was described as a transformative experience. Participants considered the chance of survival to be an important consideration in shared decision-making with ICU clinicians about ICU treatments. The median chance of survival that made ICU treatment acceptable was 30%. DISCUSSION: An understanding of the experiences associated with being a patient in the ICU can inform how patients and clinicians consider the risk-benefit analysis of ICU treatment. The experiential harms of ICU admission and the risk of ICU treatment resulting in a negative dying experience may outweigh the survival benefit that ICU treatment will offer a patient when there is a low chance of survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.