ArticleGM crops & food2026
Drivers of farmers' intentions to adopt genome-edited cassava resistant to cassava brown streak disease in Uganda.
Article in GM crops & food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing has been increasingly promoted as a promising breeding technology to strengthen the agrifood system. However, its success largely depends on farmers' adoption of the technology, a topic that remains insufficiently addressed in current literature. This study applies the model of goal-directed behavior (MGB) to examine farmers' adoption intention for genome edited (GE) cassava, resistant to cassava brown streak disease, in a hypothetical scenario in a developing country context. Data was collected from a cross-sectional survey of 357 cassava farmers in Northern Uganda and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The results show that farmers have positive intentions toward adopting GE cassava if it becomes available in the market. However, their intentions to adopt depend on their attitude, perceived behavioral control, desire, positive anticipated emotions and subjective norms. Negative anticipated emotions and subjective norms had no significant influence on the desire to adopt GE cassava. The findings also highlight the mediating role of desire and the role of affective drivers in shaping adoption intentions, underscoring the importance of dual process perspectives in agricultural technology adoption. Farmers' education level and experience emerged as important moderators for certain model pathways, revealing a need for segmented approaches for fostering the adoption of GE cassava once they are available. This study contributes empirically by extending the application of the MGB to agricultural biotechnology and offers practical insights for future development and deployment of GE crops in developing country contexts like Uganda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.