Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421300›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2026

Food industry's interactions with nutrition professionals in Australia: a survey.

Navid Teimouri, Katherine E Sievert, Adam Hannah, Katherine Cullerton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Navid TeimouriSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3340-3688
Katherine E SievertSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4617-8034
Adam HannahSchool of Political Science and International Studies, The University of Queensland, Australia.
Katherine CullertonSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9517-6380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify interactions between the food, beverage and nutrition supplement industry and nutrition professionals (NP) in Australia.

designThe study employed a cross-sectional analysis of interactions by using an online survey including open and closed questions.

settingAustralia.

participants156 practicing NP were recorded, 118 of them included in the analysis, 86 of which were dietitians.

resultsAmong respondents, eighty-eight (75 %) reported having previously received promotional material from industry, and seventy-four (66 %) have attended industry-sponsored educational events for professional development. Fifty-six (47 %) reported receiving gifts from industry in the past year. Of those who have received promotional or educational material, eleven (12 %) found it not useful at all, while others declared it slightly to extremely useful. Further analysis revealed that professional bodies and networks acted as intermediaries between industry and NP and that there were differences in judgement based on the specific industry they receive the material from.

conclusionThe Australian food, beverage and nutrition supplement industry is attempting to actively engage with NP to promote their products through trusted sources. NP' opinions on this vary, and further research is needed to examine the scope and impact of these interactions.

Indexed as

Food IndustryInterprofessional RelationsNutritionistsAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDietary SupplementsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesCommercial determinants of healthConflict of interestDietitianFood industryNutrition professionalsPublic healthSurvey

Identifiers

PMID42421300
PMCPMC13434609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.