Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421193›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2026

Promoting Voices of People With Dementia: Examining Barriers to Participation in Residential Aged Care Consultation.

Kristina Chelberg, Linda Steele, Kate Swaffer, Lyn Phillipson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristina ChelbergFaculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8836-9686
Linda SteeleFaculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6944-7888
Kate SwafferSchool of Social Work and Social Care, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-2431
Lyn PhillipsonUTS Ageing Research Collaborative, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-0291

Funding

Dementia Australia Research FoundationLaw Research Grant Scheme, Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consultation is fundamental to a responsive aged care system. Cornerstone aged care reforms based on recommendations by the Australian Aged Care Royal Commission mandate resident consultation through the Quality Indicator Program and Resident Experience Survey, a new Aged Care Act and Strengthened Quality Standards. However, people with dementia are known to be underrepresented in research, particularly in residential aged care settings, and emergent scholarship indicates a similar exclusion from aged care policy and reform. Currently, the extent to which residents with dementia participate in consultation remains underexamined. Given the majority of aged care residents live with dementia, it is critical to ensure their voices are heard in consultation that informs aged care systems change. This paper critically examines intersecting domains of cultural, legal and structural barriers that are predicted to contribute to the exclusion of residents with dementia from direct participation in aged care consultation processes. This unaddressed exclusion is argued to be a form of epistemic injustice for residents with dementia that may contribute to unresponsive aged care delivery and high rates of proxy participation. Future directions propose data transparency of resident participation in aged care consultation, and a radical shift towards innovative approaches to ensure all resident voices are heard.

Indexed as

DementiaHomes for the AgedNursing Home ResidentsPatient ParticipationReferral and ConsultationAgedAge FactorsAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaCultural CharacteristicsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansdementiaresidential aged care facilityvoice

Identifiers

PMID42421193
PMCPMC13346493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.