ArticleAustralasian journal on ageing2026
Promoting Voices of People With Dementia: Examining Barriers to Participation in Residential Aged Care Consultation.
Article in Australasian journal on ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Consultation is fundamental to a responsive aged care system. Cornerstone aged care reforms based on recommendations by the Australian Aged Care Royal Commission mandate resident consultation through the Quality Indicator Program and Resident Experience Survey, a new Aged Care Act and Strengthened Quality Standards. However, people with dementia are known to be underrepresented in research, particularly in residential aged care settings, and emergent scholarship indicates a similar exclusion from aged care policy and reform. Currently, the extent to which residents with dementia participate in consultation remains underexamined. Given the majority of aged care residents live with dementia, it is critical to ensure their voices are heard in consultation that informs aged care systems change. This paper critically examines intersecting domains of cultural, legal and structural barriers that are predicted to contribute to the exclusion of residents with dementia from direct participation in aged care consultation processes. This unaddressed exclusion is argued to be a form of epistemic injustice for residents with dementia that may contribute to unresponsive aged care delivery and high rates of proxy participation. Future directions propose data transparency of resident participation in aged care consultation, and a radical shift towards innovative approaches to ensure all resident voices are heard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.