Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421147›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2026

Promoting equity for children and adolescents through implementation processes in health and social care: a scoping review.

Michelle Gooey, Heather Morris, Rebecca Madill, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Ahlia Griffiths, Melissa Savaglio, Claire Blewitt, Amanda O'Connor, Sara Holton, Helia Khalesi and 6 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Michelle Gooey *Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. michelle.gooey@monash.edu.
Heather Morris *Health and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. heather.morris@monash.edu.
Rebecca MadillHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Callie Walsh-BaileyDepartment of Medical Social Sciences and Centre for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Ahlia GriffithsHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Melissa SavaglioHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Claire BlewittHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Amanda O'ConnorHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Sara HoltonHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Helia KhalesiHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Sofia Grage-MooreHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Maria FernandezPopulation Health and Implementation Science, UTHealth Houston, Houston, USA.
Echezona E EzeanolueCenter for Translation and Implementation Research, IVAN Research Institute, University of Nigeria and Nigeria Implementation Science Alliance (NISA), Abuja, Nigeria.
Allison MetzSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Ana BaumannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Science, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, USA.
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. helen.skouteris@monash.edu.

Funding

NUCATS CTSA K12 Program at Northwestern UniversityK12TR005104 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Leena Sharma, BETINA YANEZ · 2024 to 2026
$3.2M
Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research Award DE240100154NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR005104NIH HHS NCATS 12TR005104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the many existing implementation methods, theories, and frameworks, implementation science is insufficiently closing the research-to-practice gap. Bridging this gap is critical to achieving healthy and thriving communities globally, and requires implementation processes that promote equity and reach diverse populations, especially those most in need. The aim of this scoping review was to identify, thematically analyse, categorise, and provide examples of implementation processes described in equity-focused literature, with a focus on health and social care interventions for children and adolescents from birth to 18 years of age.

methodsA comprehensive search of literature was undertaken across six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Proquest) and Google Scholar, seeking peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2018 and April 2024. All articles were double-screened at abstract and full text stage. Implementation processes were identified then thematically analysed.

resultsA total of 14,374 articles were screened; 80 articles (59 health, 21 social care) were included in the analysis. Seven main themes were identified: (1) foster trusting relationships; (2) dismantle top-down approaches and redistribute power; (3) invest with intention; (4) respect and value community-defined evidence; (5) tailor according to context; (6) broaden perspectives beyond practice norms; and (7) use strengths- and value-based approaches. Twenty-six sub-themes and 140 implementation processes were identified, including examples of how these can be operationalised in practice.

conclusionThis is the first review of equity-focused implementation processes in health and social care. By offering practical examples of the identified implementation processes, the review synthesises findings from published literature into tangible actions directly relevant to implementation practice. However, while these processes show promise, further research is required as their effectiveness remains largely untested and most evidence is from high-income countries. To promote health and social care equity for all children and adolescents, the evidence-base for effective equitable implementation work must be strengthened by, and reflective of, globally diverse voices and experiences.

Indexed as

Health EquitySocial WorkAdolescentChildHumansAdolescentsChildrenEquityHealthImplementationScoping reviewSocial care

Identifiers

PMID42421147
PMCPMC13548690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.