ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Promoting equity for children and adolescents through implementation processes in health and social care: a scoping review.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the many existing implementation methods, theories, and frameworks, implementation science is insufficiently closing the research-to-practice gap. Bridging this gap is critical to achieving healthy and thriving communities globally, and requires implementation processes that promote equity and reach diverse populations, especially those most in need. The aim of this scoping review was to identify, thematically analyse, categorise, and provide examples of implementation processes described in equity-focused literature, with a focus on health and social care interventions for children and adolescents from birth to 18 years of age.
methodsA comprehensive search of literature was undertaken across six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Proquest) and Google Scholar, seeking peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2018 and April 2024. All articles were double-screened at abstract and full text stage. Implementation processes were identified then thematically analysed.
resultsA total of 14,374 articles were screened; 80 articles (59 health, 21 social care) were included in the analysis. Seven main themes were identified: (1) foster trusting relationships; (2) dismantle top-down approaches and redistribute power; (3) invest with intention; (4) respect and value community-defined evidence; (5) tailor according to context; (6) broaden perspectives beyond practice norms; and (7) use strengths- and value-based approaches. Twenty-six sub-themes and 140 implementation processes were identified, including examples of how these can be operationalised in practice.
conclusionThis is the first review of equity-focused implementation processes in health and social care. By offering practical examples of the identified implementation processes, the review synthesises findings from published literature into tangible actions directly relevant to implementation practice. However, while these processes show promise, further research is required as their effectiveness remains largely untested and most evidence is from high-income countries. To promote health and social care equity for all children and adolescents, the evidence-base for effective equitable implementation work must be strengthened by, and reflective of, globally diverse voices and experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.