ArticleMovement ecology2026
Discrete foraging landscapes support large scale migrations of a marine fish.
Article in Movement ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many marine animals migrate thousands of kilometers, yet the spatial extent of dietary resources acquired along these routes remains poorly understood. Identifying foraging areas across a species' annual cycle is critical for understanding habitat connectivity, aligning conservation with locations essential for sustaining populations, and predicting how environmental variability influences resources. We integrated continental-scale stable isotope assignment modeling (n = 417 individuals) with five years of electronic tagging (n = 85 individuals), using movement data to spatially constrain isotope-based foraging assignments, to identify foraging locations along migration routes of Atlantic tarpon (Megalops atlanticus). Distinct foraging regions emerged across the southeastern United States, including South Florida, the northern Gulf of Mexico, and the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Tissue-specific isotope incorporation rates indicated temporal variation in habitat use, with foraging activity often hundreds of kilometers from capture sites (mean distance to peak probability = 296 ± 188 km). These findings provide a framework for managing foraging habitats essential for highly migratory marine species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.