ArticleBMC psychology2026
Reliability and validity of Turkish version of stress resilience item bank 10 item short form.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to adapt the Stress Resilience Item Bank 10-Item Short Form, originally developed in German, into Turkish for patients diagnosed with psychosomatic disorders, and to evaluate its psychometric properties, validity, and reliability.
methodThe study included 507 patients aged 18-65 years whose conditions were historically categorized under psychosomatic disorders and who were diagnosed with Mental Factors Affecting Other Medical Conditions according to DSM-5 criteria, along with 74 healthy controls. Sociodemographic data were collected using a structured data form completed by patients and, when applicable, their relatives. Participants completed the Stress Resilience Item Bank 10-Item Short Form, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Brief Resilience Scale, and the ICD-10 Symptom Rating Scale.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 45.9 ± 15 years, and 74.2% were female. In the reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha was 0.79. Test-retest reliability indicated a high correlation between the two measurements (r = .675, p < .001). In validity analyses, exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor structure explaining 49.2% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported this structure, with acceptable model fit indices (RMSEA = 0.062, CFI = 0.942, GFI = 0.962). The Stress Resilience Item Bank 10-Item Short Form showed significant correlations with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the Brief Resilience Scale (r = .73, p < .001; r = .67, p < .001, respectively).
conclusionThe Stress Resilience Item Bank 10-Item Short Form, has been identified as a suitable, valid, and reliable measurement tool for use in the Turkish patient population with psychosomatic disorders, the majority of whom are women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.