ArticleBMC psychology2026
Age differences in proactive and reactive control: valence asymmetries in the processing of complex emotional scenes.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates age differences in proactive and reactive control during emotional scene processing, using complex scenes that require effortful top-down interpretation. Sixty-two participants (32 young and 30 older adults) completed an emotional AX-CPT task with positive, negative, and neutral scenes. Results revealed that the relative balance between proactive and reactive control in older adults was asymmetrically shaped by emotional valence when processing complex perceptually demanding stimuli. For positive scenes, older adults showed a relative reliance on proactive control, evidenced by higher Proactive Behavioral Index (PBI) scores. For negative scenes, they exhibited reduced proactive control, with higher error rates on neutral-negative sequences, whereas young adults showed the opposite pattern. Because the experimental design did not include a facial-expression comparison condition, conclusions about stimulus-type moderation are necessarily tentative. Nevertheless, these findings provide initial evidence that valence-specific control asymmetries are expressed under conditions of high conceptual and perceptual demand. Older adults appeared to differentially deploy control resources for positive versus negative stimuli under demanding conditions. This study provides new evidence that adaptive control is dynamically reshaped by the processing demands associated with complex emotional materials, offering a foundation for future research examining how stimulus complexity interacts with motivational priorities in aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.