ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026
H-score and ERBB2 mRNA refine identification of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate HER2 assessment is essential for breast cancer (BC) treatment, as it directs targeted therapy decisions and predicts patient prognosis. Even though immunohistochemistry (IHC) is widely used, manual scoring is susceptible to variability. This study was conducted to evaluate HER2 expression in HER2-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), using H-score and ERBB2 mRNA quantification.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in breast cancer patients treated with NAC between 2017 and 2023. H-score was evaluated in 506 patients. For gene expression analyses, only tumors with available H-score and Ct ≤ 35 for all candidate reference genes were included, resulting in 173 evaluable cases for ERBB2 mRNA quantification. HER2-zero tumors were further stratified into HER2-null (H-score = 0) and HER2-ultralow (H-score 1-120) groups.
resultsAmong all 506 HER2-negative tumors, 54.6% were classified as HER2-low and 45.4% as HER2-zero. Within the HER2-zero subgroup, 47.4% showed measurable HER2 expression (HER2-ultralow). ERBB2 mRNA levels were significantly higher in HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-zero. Among HER2-zero, HER2-ultralow tumors had higher ERBB2 expression than HER2-null. Higher H-scores were associated with increased ERBB2 transcript expression, according to Spearman correlation coefficient (p < 0.05). HER2-null tumors were more frequently triple-negative.
conclusionsQuantitative assessment by H-score and ERBB2 transcript analysis reveals heterogeneity within HER2-zero tumors, identifying a HER2-ultralow population with potentially distinct clinical behavior. These findings support the integration of continuous HER2 expression metrics into clinical decision-making and trial design, particularly in the era of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.