Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42421038›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Effects of an evidence-based practice intensive on competency: a pre/post domain-level program evaluation.

Madeleine Whalen, Heather Watson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madeleine WhalenThe Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St., Baltimore, MD, USA. Mwhalen8@jhmi.edu.
Heather WatsonThe Johns Hopkins Hospital, 1800 Orleans St., Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses struggle to engage meaningfully in all aspects of the evidence-based practice (EBP) process. This is due to a variety of barriers at the organizational and interpersonal level. Providing education can not only increase knowledge, but also potentially address other aspects of competency, such as attitudes and behaviors, as well as provides demonstrable organizational support. The aim of this initiative was to increase nurses' competency in the EBP process by implementing and evaluating a cohorted, hands-on educational program.

methodsSubject matter experts created and facilitated a cohorted EBP intensive course that included didactic work and the completion of an EBP project, from problem identification to dissemination. A pre/post course evaluation was used to examine the effects of the course on nurses' EBP values, knowledge, and implementation behaviors. Other project outcomes, such as impact on future research, publications, and presentations were also tracked.

resultsAs of 2020, four cohorts had been held with a total of 53 participants across 5 and the 6 hospitals in the health system. There were no significant differences between pre/post value and implementation scores; however, there was statistically significant improvement in perceived knowledge scores with a large effect size. The cohorts produced 5 conference presentations, 5 published manuscripts, and provided the background for 3 multi-site research studies linked to Magnet designation.

conclusionParticipants demonstrated statistically significant improvement in perceived knowledge, and non-statistically significant decreases in perceived value and increases in implementation. There were no differences in domains as compared to years of experience. This evaluation underscores the importance of addressing all domains of competency, and the dual focus on skill development and real-world application demonstrates the potential for education programs to simultaneously build capacity and advance the profession's evidence base while acknowledging the need for systemic, sustainable supports.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practice, EBP, Nursing, Professional development, Competency

Identifiers

PMID42421038
PMCPMC13637231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.