ArticleBMC medical education2026
Artificial intelligence literacy, rather than artificial intelligence anxiety, is associated with career optimism in physiotherapy and rehabilitation students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping health professions education, but its relationship with students' future career outlook remains insufficiently understood, particularly in professions where human interaction remains central to practice. This study examined whether career optimism in physiotherapy and rehabilitation students was more closely associated with AI literacy than with AI anxiety.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 438 undergraduate physiotherapy and rehabilitation students from universities in Ankara and Konya, Türkiye. Data were collected online between 27 February 2026 and 10 March 2026 using Turkish versions of the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale, Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale, and the Career Optimism subscale of the Career Futures Inventory. Pearson correlations, subgroup comparisons, and hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were performed. HC3 robust standard errors were used in sensitivity analyses.
resultsAI literacy was positively associated with career optimism (r = 0.396, p < 0.001), whereas AI anxiety showed a weaker negative association (r = - 0.147, p = 0.002). In hierarchical regression analyses, AI literacy was the only variable independently associated with career optimism in both the crude model (B = 0.281, β = 0.384, p < 0.001) and the adjusted model controlling for age, gender, class year, grade point average, formal AI-related training, and weekly AI use frequency (B = 0.284, β = 0.388, p < 0.001). AI anxiety was not independently associated with career optimism in either model. Sensitivity analyses using HC3 robust standard errors supported these findings.
conclusionsAmong physiotherapy and rehabilitation students, career optimism was more strongly associated with AI literacy than with AI anxiety. Even in a strongly human-centered health profession, students' career-related expectations appear to be linked more closely to perceived AI-related competence than to AI-related anxiety. Educational strategies may therefore benefit from supporting AI literacy as part of future professional readiness.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.