ArticleBMC health services research2026
Addressing real-world data gaps: estimating the uk population cost of crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis using a flexible cost-of-illness model informed by the optimal patient journey and IBDUK patient survey 2023.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), are chronic conditions affecting around 500,000 people in the UK and carries rising prevalence and substantial economic burden. Despite expanding therapeutic choice, contemporary UK cost analyses are scarce. A flexible cost of illness model was developed to estimate the excess costs associated with CDUC in the UK at a population level, including direct NHS costs and societal costs. The model estimates how the direct healthcare and indirect societal costs of IBD change over time, helping to analyse and manage key cost drivers. This supports planning and policy decisions by outlining how interventions and external influences affect long-term spending patterns.
methodsThe study used public data, published research, and the 2023 IBD UK survey to create a cost model covering prevalence, diagnosis, management, complications, and mortality of CD and UC. Clinical management inputs included resource use associated with the ideal pathways in line with IBD Standards. This model estimated and compared healthcare use and complications in people with CD and UC to the general population over 15 years, including costs from flare-ups, remission, and societal impacts.
findingsThe estimated total annual direct healthcare cost based on an optimal patient journey for CD and UC is £3 billion. Ongoing management makes up around 93% of this cost (£2.8 billion), of which 84% of this makes up remission-related treatment in people with active disease. The ongoing management costs of active disease is almost 3 times higher costs in remission, at £185,903,000 and £67,557,000 respectively. The annual lost productivity cost of CD and UC is estimated at around £0.8 billion, mostly due to inability to work. The total healthcare costs are £3.8 billion. In the absence of robust population based real-world data, and given the complexity of IBD care, this model offers a practical solution for estimating population costs, which are likely underestimated, and can be adapted as more accurate datasets become available.
interpretationAlthough pharmacological treatment accounts for a substantial proportion of IBD expenditure, effective control of inflammation and maintenance of remission are likely critical for reducing downstream complications, hospitalisation, surgery, disability, and productivity losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.