Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420990›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Medical students' experiences of mixed-reality-based anatomy instruction in a non-cadaveric curriculum: a qualitative case study.

Joseph Lin, Sarmad Ghazi, Ethan Kuss, Sarah Shehata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph LinCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, California Health Sciences University, 2500 Alluvial Ave, Clovis, CA, 93611, USA. jlin@chsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4432-2955
Sarmad GhaziCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, California Health Sciences University, 2500 Alluvial Ave, Clovis, CA, 93611, USA.
Ethan KussCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, California Health Sciences University, 2500 Alluvial Ave, Clovis, CA, 93611, USA.
Sarah ShehataCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, California Health Sciences University, 2500 Alluvial Ave, Clovis, CA, 93611, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomy education requires students to understand complex three-dimensional relationships, yet traditional resources such as textbooks and static images may not fully support spatial learning for all learners, particularly in reduced- or non-cadaveric curricula. Mixed-reality technologies, including the HoloAnatomy application delivered through Microsoft HoloLens 2, have emerged as promising instructional supplements for anatomy education. However, qualitative research examining how students experience these tools within non-cadaveric curricula remains limited.

objectiveThis study explored first-year medical students' perceptions of HoloAnatomy mixed-reality-based anatomy instruction within a non-cadaveric osteopathic medical curriculum, with attention to perceived benefits, challenges, engagement, spatial understanding, and knowledge recall.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 volunteer first-year medical students from an eligible cohort of 160 students at a single osteopathic medical school in California. All participants had completed nine months of required, non-cadaveric anatomy laboratory sessions that integrated faculty-led instruction, Microsoft PowerPoint slide presentations, and HoloAnatomy mixed-reality instruction delivered through Microsoft HoloLens 2. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and returned to participants for verification. Data were analyzed in NVivo using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework for thematic analysis.

resultsStudents perceived the mixed-reality sessions as especially valuable for three-dimensional visualization, spatial orientation, collaborative learning, and review of anatomical structures. However, they also identified important limitations, including technical instability, physical discomfort, limited anatomical realism, and restricted ability to manipulate the models. Overall, students viewed HoloAnatomy delivered through HoloLens 2 as a useful supplement to anatomy learning rather than a replacement for other instructional approaches.

conclusionsThe HoloAnatomy mixed-reality experience may enrich anatomy education most effectively when used as a supplementary instructional tool within a multimodal curriculum. Continued refinement of the technology, stronger technical infrastructure, and careful curricular integration may further enhance its perceived educational value in medical anatomy teaching.

Indexed as

AnatomyComputer-Assisted InstructionCurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateOsteopathic MedicineStudents, MedicalCaliforniaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchAnatomy educationAugmented realityHoloAnatomyHoloLensMedical educationMixed realityQualitative research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.