ArticleBMC medical education2026
Medical students' experiences of mixed-reality-based anatomy instruction in a non-cadaveric curriculum: a qualitative case study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnatomy education requires students to understand complex three-dimensional relationships, yet traditional resources such as textbooks and static images may not fully support spatial learning for all learners, particularly in reduced- or non-cadaveric curricula. Mixed-reality technologies, including the HoloAnatomy application delivered through Microsoft HoloLens 2, have emerged as promising instructional supplements for anatomy education. However, qualitative research examining how students experience these tools within non-cadaveric curricula remains limited.
objectiveThis study explored first-year medical students' perceptions of HoloAnatomy mixed-reality-based anatomy instruction within a non-cadaveric osteopathic medical curriculum, with attention to perceived benefits, challenges, engagement, spatial understanding, and knowledge recall.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 volunteer first-year medical students from an eligible cohort of 160 students at a single osteopathic medical school in California. All participants had completed nine months of required, non-cadaveric anatomy laboratory sessions that integrated faculty-led instruction, Microsoft PowerPoint slide presentations, and HoloAnatomy mixed-reality instruction delivered through Microsoft HoloLens 2. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and returned to participants for verification. Data were analyzed in NVivo using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework for thematic analysis.
resultsStudents perceived the mixed-reality sessions as especially valuable for three-dimensional visualization, spatial orientation, collaborative learning, and review of anatomical structures. However, they also identified important limitations, including technical instability, physical discomfort, limited anatomical realism, and restricted ability to manipulate the models. Overall, students viewed HoloAnatomy delivered through HoloLens 2 as a useful supplement to anatomy learning rather than a replacement for other instructional approaches.
conclusionsThe HoloAnatomy mixed-reality experience may enrich anatomy education most effectively when used as a supplementary instructional tool within a multimodal curriculum. Continued refinement of the technology, stronger technical infrastructure, and careful curricular integration may further enhance its perceived educational value in medical anatomy teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42420990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.