Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420982›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Distinct patterns in study techniques and intrinsic challenges in nursing students' self-directed learning: an exploratory, comparative qualitative study.

Monika Ravik, Charlotte Weider, Hanne Nørbygaard Bjerva, Karin Bölenius

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Monika RavikDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post-box 4, Borre, 3199, Norway. Monika.Ravik@usn.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1490-9341
Charlotte WeiderDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post-box 4, Borre, 3199, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2631-3141
Hanne Nørbygaard BjervaDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post-box 4, Borre, 3199, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7186-5110
Karin BöleniusKarin Bölenius Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-0729

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-directed learning supports nursing students' professional development by enabling them to deepen their theoretical knowledge, particularly in complex foundational subjects such as anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry. Becoming a self-directed learner is therefore crucial for academic success and continued professional growth. However, intrinsic (student-related) factors can challenge students' efforts to engage in effective self-directed learning, especially in these demanding subjects. Despite this, little is known about which intrinsic factors first-year nursing students perceive as hindering their self-directed learning in biosciences, and whether these differ between younger and mature students. Understanding these intrinsic factors in detail is thus essential for nurse educators who support nursing students' learning in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry. The aim of the study was to explore and compare intrinsic factors that challenge young and mature nursing students' engagement in self-directed learning of anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative design was employed. Written responses from 98 first-year nursing students were collected in November 2024. Each response was approximately 150 words in length. The students answered an open-ended question about contextual and intrinsic factors hindering self-directed learning in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry, submitted via the university's digital learning platform. The responses were analysed using qualitative content analysis, with a comparative component between two age-defined groups (younger and mature students).

resultsFour categories of intrinsic factors that challenge first-year nursing students' self-directed learning in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry were identified: (1) Challenges with effective study techniques in self-directed learning, (2) Challenges with motivation in self-directed learning, (3) Health-related constraints on self-directed learning, and (4) Procrastination in self-directed learning.

conclusionsThe results revealed intrinsic factors that challenged self-directed learning in anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry among nursing students. The results underscore the need for nurse educators and institutions to recognize and address the intrinsic factors when designing learning environments and support strategies, in order to better facilitate effective self-directed learning in foundational subjects in nursing.

Indexed as

Self-Directed Learning as TopicStudents, NursingAdultAnatomyBiochemistryEducation, Nursing, BaccalaureateFemaleHumansMalePhysiologyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAnatomyBiochemistryLearningNursing educationNursing studentsPhysiologySelf-directed learning

Identifiers

PMID42420982
PMCPMC13637188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.