Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420981›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Dental students' perceptions of preclinical and clinical prosthodontic education: a cross-sectional survey.

Hamiyet Güngör, Ceren Karaahmetoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamiyet GüngörDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lokman Hekim University, Söğütözü Dist. 2179 St.No:4, Çankaya, Ankara, 06510, Turkey.
Ceren KaraahmetogluDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lokman Hekim University, Söğütözü Dist. 2179 St.No:4, Çankaya, Ankara, 06510, Turkey. cerenurcu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-7637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preclinical and clinical prosthodontic training and self-perceived clinical competence among 4th- and 5th-year dental students at Lokman Hekim University Faculty of Dentistry.

methodsEthical approval was obtained prior to the study (Decision No: 2025/5; Protocol No: 2025127). A 24-item questionnaire using five-point Likert-scale responses was administered to 131 4th- and 5th-year dental students during the 2024-2025 academic year. The questionnaire included three domains: preclinical-clinical practice similarity and self-perceived clinical competence, curriculum and educational content, and clinical confidence and learning needs. The instrument was developed based on relevant literature, reviewed by prosthodontic experts, and pilot tested before administration. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27 software; Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used, with Bonferroni correction applied for multiple comparisons.

resultsSignificant differences were observed according to academic year and gender. 5th-year students reported lower perceived sufficiency of preclinical training on impression procedures for fixed prostheses (p = 0.017), more frequent experience with virtual reality applications (p < 0.001), higher self-perceived knowledge in selected removable partial denture procedures (p = 0.015), and a higher perceived need for increased preclinical training (p = 0.028). Male students reported higher self-confidence during clinical practice than female students (p = 0.008). Significant associations were also found between perceived alignment of preclinical-clinical practices with current treatment protocols, perceived need for curriculum revision, and self-perceived clinical competence (p < 0.001). Effect size analysis showed small-to-moderate effects for most significant findings, with the largest effect observed for virtual reality use according to academic year (r = 0.584).

conclusionThe findings suggest that students' perceptions of prosthodontic education vary according to academic year and gender. Since the study was based on self-reported questionnaire data, the findings reflect self-perceived clinical competence rather than objectively measured clinical competence. Closer alignment between preclinical and clinical instruction, integration of updated clinical procedures, and expanded early clinical exposure may support students' perceived preparedness and clinical confidence.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, DentalProsthodonticsStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSelf ConceptSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical competenceDental educationDental studentsProsthodontics

Identifiers

PMID42420981
PMCPMC13540830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.