Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420960›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

The impact of China's non-pharmaceutical interventions on economic growth during COVID-19: a provincial-level panel analysis.

Yisha Ma, Barjoyai Bin Bardai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yisha MaXian Kedagaoxin University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China. ma.yisha@phd.must.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4301-2114
Barjoyai Bin BardaiFaculty of Management, Malaysia University of Science and Technology, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the economic impacts of non-pharmaceutical interventions implemented in China during the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing a provincial-level panel dataset from 2020Q1 to 2022Q4. We employ a pooled OLS model with panel-corrected standard errors (PCSE) to address cross-sectional dependence, serial correlation, and heteroskedasticity, while a fixed-effects instrumental variable (FE-IV) model is used to resolve endogeneity from reverse causality. The analysis reveals that NPIs significantly reduced quarterly GDP growth, with coefficients ranging from -0.078 to 0.154 across models. Regional heterogeneity shows stronger negative effects in eastern (-0.092) provinces compared to western and central provinces. Temporal analysis further identifies an empirically observed three-stage targeted response: significant negative impacts in 2020 (-0.180), but an insignificant effect in 2021 and 2022, reflecting policy adjustments and economic adaptation. The findings underscore the trade-offs between public health measures and economic performance, with an estimated 0.096 percentage point economic loss due to NPIs, consistent with global studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Economic DevelopmentPandemicsChinaGross Domestic ProductHumansSARS-CoV-2ChinaCOVID-19Dynamic modelEconomic impactNon-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs)Regional heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID42420960
PMCPMC13628796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.