Observational studyBMC pediatrics2026
Reproducibility of an 85-item Child Food Frequency Questionnaire (85-item Child-FFQ) and diet quality scores among Polish children: The cross-sectional PITNUTS 2024 study.
Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06417151 (Comprehensive Dietary Assessment of Children Aged 1 Year to 6 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comprehensive Dietary Assessment of Children Aged 1 Year to 6 Years (5-72 Months) - a Cross-sectional, Nationwide Study: PITNUTS 2024
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly childhood nutrition is crucial for long-term health; however, assessing dietary intake in young children is challenging due to the reliance on parent/caregiver reporting and the need for culturally relevant tools. The aim of this study (the Polish Infant and Toddler Nutrition Study, PITNUTS 2024) was to address this gap by developing and evaluating the reproducibility of a new 85-item Child Food Frequency Questionnaire (85-item Child-FFQ) and associated diet quality scores for Polish children aged 13-72 months.
methodsA cross-sectional, nationally representative sample of 700 Polish children from two age groups (13-36 and 37-72 months) was recruited, and 100 children were randomly selected from each age group for the reproducibility study. The 85-item Child-FFQ was administered twice to the same parent as a proxy reporter. Three diet quality scores were developed: the children's pro-Healthy Diet Score, the children's non-Healthy Diet Score, the children's Ultra-Processed Food Score. Statistical analyses included comparisons of mean values for food consumption frequency and diet quality scores, cross-classification, kappa statistic, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman's correlation, and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsThe 85-item Child-FFQ showed good test-retest reproducibility. Classification agreement for food consumption frequency ranged from 74% to 97% for children aged 13-36 months, and 77% to 95% for children aged 37-72 months. The kappa statistic indicated moderate to excellent agreement between test and retest of the FFQ. Diet quality scores demonstrated high reproducibility, with classification agreement ranging from 77% to 92%, the kappa statistic ranging from 0.62 to 0.86, and good to excellent correlation coefficients (ICC: 0.886-0.950, Spearman's r: 0.889-0.947). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small negative shift between test and retest of the diet quality scores and moderately wide limits of agreement.
conclusionsThe newly developed 85-item Child-FFQ is a reliable tool for assessing habitual food consumption frequency and diet quality in Polish children aged 13-72 months. This tool has the potential to help monitor food consumption and diet quality variations over time, though this capacity needs to be validated through future longitudinal studies.
trial registrationThis trial was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT06417151, 16th May 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.