Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Maternal satisfaction and perceived quality of care during childbirth in a tertiary care Italian Obstetrics Unit: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal satisfaction is a widely used indicator for evaluating the quality of maternity services and is linked to important psychological and relational outcomes. In Italy, limited data have been published on women's childbirth experiences, generally showing high satisfaction, but highlighting areas needing improvement, such as communication and pain management, especially during emergency cesarean section or operative vaginal delivery. This study primarily aimed to assess women's overall evaluation of their labor and delivery experiences. Additionally, we examined sociodemographic and obstetric factors that may influence maternal satisfaction and explored satisfaction across specific experiential domains.
methodsThis is an observational, cross-sectional, non-pharmacological, non-profit, monocentric study conducted between June and October 2024 at the Unit of Obstetrics and Maternal Fetal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan. A total of 696 women were consecutively recruited during their postpartum hospital stay. Participants completed a pseudonymized questionnaire which consisted of three sections: sociodemographic data, obstetric history, and birth experience evaluation using a 5-point Likert scale. Maternal satisfaction was operationalized as a retrospective self-reported appraisal of care. We used logistic regression to estimate prevalence odds ratios (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between dissatisfaction and selected maternal and obstetric factors.
resultsOverall, 85.3% (95% CI: 82.7%-88.0%) of women reported satisfaction with their labor and delivery experience. Previous childbirth was inversely associated with dissatisfaction (OR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.29-0.97). In contrast, higher maternal age (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.00-1.10), labor induction (OR=2.18, 95% CI: 1.31-3.61), and operative delivery (OR=3.37, 95% CI: 2.06-5.51) were positively associated with dissatisfaction. The main concerns reported by dissatisfied women included inadequate pain management, lack of perceived control, and insufficient emotional support.
conclusionsDespite high overall maternal satisfaction, relevant gaps persist in communication, emotional support, pain management, and perceived control during childbirth. Interventions promoting shared decision-making, structured communication, and systematic use of satisfaction surveys and birth plans may support a more woman-centered approach to maternity care, potentially improving both women's evaluation of care and the quality of intrapartum services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.