Observational studyBMC neurology2026
Pain outcomes and safety of dorsal root ganglion-targeted transforaminal injection for postherpetic neuralgia: a retrospective single-center cohort study.
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a refractory neuropathic pain syndrome after herpes zoster and is often complicated by medication intolerance in older adults. The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is a biologically plausible target for interventional analgesia.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational single-arm cohort study including consecutive adults with PHN, who underwent DRG-targeted transforaminal injection (DRG-TFI; local anesthetic with or without corticosteroid) between January 2022 and June 2024. Time zero was the first DRG-TFI during the study period. The primary endpoint was within-patient change in 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) pain from baseline to 4 weeks. We report observed pain outcomes and responder rates with confidence intervals (CIs). A linear mixed-effects model is presented to summarize repeated NRS assessments with incomplete follow-up. Exploratory summaries added sleep-disturbance NRS, absolute pain-reduction thresholds, analgesic co-medication trajectories, and calibration of the short-term responder model.
resultsAmong 298 included patients (mean age 65.7 ± 10.9 years; 58.1% female), baseline NRS was 7.3 ± 1.1 and a 4-week assessment was available for 279 (93.6%). In the mixed-effects model, mean NRS decreased by - 3.1 points at 4 weeks (95% CI - 3.4 to - 2.8; P < 0.001), with an observed 4-week NRS of 4.1 ± 1.9. At 4 weeks, 191/279 (68.5%, 95% CI 62.7-73.9%) achieved ≥ 30% pain reduction and 118/279 (42.3%, 95% CI 36.4-48.3%) achieved ≥ 50% reduction. Procedure-related adverse events were documented in 26/298 (8.7%), with no documented persistent neurologic deficits or infections. At 4 weeks, 232/279 (83.2%, 95% CI 78.2-87.4%) achieved a ≥ 2-point NRS reduction and 145/279 (52.0%, 95% CI 45.9-58.0%) achieved a ≥ 4-point reduction; mean sleep-disturbance NRS decreased from 6.5 ± 1.8 at baseline to 4.2 ± 2.1 at 4 weeks.
conclusionsIn this single-center retrospective cohort, DRG-TFI was associated with clinically meaningful short-term pain reduction and no documented persistent neurologic deficit or procedure-related infection. However, chart-based adverse-event ascertainment and historical particulate-steroid exposure preclude definitive safety conclusions. Longer-term outcomes should be interpreted as observed outcomes under routine care because rescue interventions occurred during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.