Observational studyBMC emergency medicine2026
Impact of pediatric urgent care clinics on emergency department utilization and patient flow: a pre-post cohort study in Saudi Arabia.
Observational study in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric emergency departments (PEDs) frequently experience overcrowding, much of it related to low-acuity visits that may be manageable in outpatient settings. Pediatric Urgent Care Clinics (PUCCs) have been introduced to help accommodate such demand, but evidence from the Gulf region remains limited.
objectivesTo evaluate changes in PED utilization, acuity mix, and patient-flow indicators following implementation of a PUCC at the Maternity and Children's Hospital in Alahsa, Saudi Arabia.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective pre-post observational cohort study using electronic health record data from October 2023 to June 2024 (pre-implementation) and October 2024 to June 2025 (post-implementation). Variables included Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level, timestamps for triage, physician start, and discharge, and demographic characteristics. Outcomes included PED visit volume, acuity distribution, door-to-doctor time, and length of stay (LOS). Continuous variables were summarized using medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and 5% trimmed means; categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and effect sizes for binary outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals.
resultsA total of 147,175 PED encounters were analyzed, including 84,595 in the pre-implementation period and 62,580 in the post-implementation period. In the post-implementation period, an additional 24,962 encounters were managed in the PUCC. The proportion of low-acuity PED visits (CTAS 4-5) decreased from 81.1% to 50.2% (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.61-0.62; p < 0.001). Mean daily PED encounter volume declined from 308.7 to 229.2 encounters/day (incidence rate ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.75; p < 0.001). Median door-to-doctor time was 37 min (IQR 22-63) before implementation and 39 min (IQR 22-65) after implementation, while median LOS increased from 62 min (IQR 34-112) to 76 min (IQR 43-131) (p < 0.001 for distributional comparisons).
conclusionImplementation of a PUCC was associated with lower PED visit volume, a reduced proportion of low-acuity PED encounters, and a small absolute difference in door-to-doctor time, while PED LOS was longer in the post-implementation period. These findings suggest that a PUCC model may help redistribute lower-acuity pediatric encounters within a hospital-based urgent and emergency care system. Further studies are needed to evaluate safety outcomes and to better account for operational confounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.