Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420732›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Feedback Control and Sensitivity Analysis in Synthetic Gene Circuits.

Ania-Ariadna Baetica

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ania-Ariadna BaeticaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Drexel University, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. ania-ariadna.baetica@drexel.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic gene circuits are engineered DNA sequences that control when genes turn on and how much they are expressed, alongside the regulatory machinery of cells. Many gene circuits use feedback, such that the molecules produced by a gene increase or decrease the expression of the same gene or another gene in the circuit. Feedback regulates how much of a molecule is produced and changes the timing of its production or degradation. However, how effective feedback is depends on biochemical parameters such as transcription, translation, and degradation rates, binding affinities and cooperativities, as well as cellular parameters such as plasmid copy numbers and the availability of cellular resources. All these parameters can change due to mutation, variation in the gene expression machinery, or changes in the cell's growth rate. To quantify how these changes affect the feedback regulation in a circuit, we introduce a method called sensitivity analysis, which measures how the steady-state expression level changes when each parameter is varied. Here, we explain sensitivity analysis and demonstrate its application to the negative autoregulation circuit. Sensitivity analysis can predict when a circuit's feedback will deteriorate, thus directing experiments to evaluate only the effects of the parameters predicted to be disruptive.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, SyntheticSynthetic BiologyFeedback regulationParameter variationSensitivity analysisSynthetic gene circuits

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.