ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
The Examination of Arterial Function and Mechanotransduction Through Brachial Arteries via Flow-Mediated Dilation.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, with endothelial dysfunction playing a pivotal role in its initiation and progression. Early detection and accurate evaluation of endothelial dysfunction are therefore essential for effective risk assessment and intervention. This chapter reviews recent developments in a widely used method, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), for assessing endothelial function in clinical research. We begin with an overview of vascular structure and endothelial physiology, laying the groundwork for a deeper exploration of the mechanotransduction processes at the cellular level that drive vasodilation during FMD. Next, we describe the FMD procedure in detail, which evaluates arterial functions by measuring ultrasound-based arterial vasodilation in response to a period of temporary ischemia. We then discuss the limitations of using FMD%, the traditional marker representing the percentage of vasodilation, as the sole output of the FMD test. Although widely used, FMD% fails to capture the full mechanotransduction process linking shear stress to arterial dilation, leading to potentially incomplete or biased interpretations. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a novel physics-based framework for interpreting FMD results. This approach utilizes a set of biophysical models to extract physiologically meaningful parameters by integrating theoretical insights with experimental FMD measurements. Finally, we outline the significant potential of this advanced FMD analysis tool, which may enable a more comprehensive and mechanistically informed assessment of endothelial function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42420709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.