ArticleAnnals of hematology2026
Baseline immunonutritional status drives CAR T-cell efficacy, survival, and safety in R/R lymphoma: validation of a pre-lymphodepletion PNI threshold.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory (R/R) lymphoma. However, heterogeneous responses and treatment-related toxicities remain significant challenges. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), reflecting both nutritional status and systemic immune competence, has emerged as a potential biomarker in various malignancies. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the PNI assessed specifically prior to lymphodepletion in patients with R/R lymphoma receiving CAR T-cell therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 449 patients with R/R lymphoma treated with CAR T cells. The PNI was calculated using serum albumin levels and absolute lymphocyte counts measured before administering lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The optimal PNI cutoff for predicting survival was determined to be 39.2 using maximally selected rank statistics. The patients were stratified into high-PNI (> 39.2, n = 363) and low-PNI (≤ 39.2, n = 86) groups on the basis of the PNI cutoff value. The median age of the patients was 52 years. All patients had R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma and were treated with CAR T cells. Compared with patients in the low-PNI group, patients in the high-PNI group achieved significantly superior clinical responses, with higher overall response rates (ORRs: 65.5% vs. 44.2%, P < 0.001) and complete response rates (CRRs: 52.2% vs. 27.9%, P < 0.001). The median follow-up period was 33.12 months, and long-term survival markedly improved among patients in the high-PNI group; the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 59.02% vs. 21.88% (P < 0.001), and the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 42.69% vs. 13.29% (P < 0.001) for patients in the high- and low-PNI groups, respectively. In terms of safety, multivariate analysis confirmed that a high PNI independently reduced the risk of any-grade CRS (P = 0.047), but was not significantly associated with grade ≥ 3 CRS (P = 0.121). No significant association was observed between a high PNI and the occurrence or severity of ICANS (all P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that a PNI > 39.2 remained an independent predictor of both OS (HR = 0.425, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 0.542, P < 0.001). The pre-lymphodepletion PNI is a simple, noninvasive, and robust tool for predicting therapeutic efficacy, long-term survival, and treatment-related toxicity in patients with R/R lymphoma receiving CAR T-cell therapy. A PNI threshold of 39.2 provides a valuable reference for risk stratification and clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.