Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420669›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

The lifetime of sequential memory traces.

Leonardo Pinto Arata, Carlos Ramisch, Arnaud Rey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonardo Pinto ArataAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France. leonardo.pinto-arata@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1690-3269
Carlos RamischAix Marseille Univ, ILCB, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Arnaud ReyAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRPN, Marseille, France.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CONV-0002Agence Nationale de la Recherche #ANR-21-CE23-0033-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche #ANR-23-CE23-0031Agence Nationale de la Recherche #ANR-23-CE28-0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implicit statistical learning of a sequence of information is determined by several factors, including the number of repetitions of the sequence and the distance between each repetition. In the present study, we used a Hebbian version of the lexical decision task in which participants must decide whether the items presented in the center of a computer screen are words or non-words. Unbeknownst to the participants, a sequence of three words is presented and repeated in the same order several times (30 times). For each group of participants, we manipulated the distance between each repetition of the triplet of words by inserting the same number of filler items (i.e., on average, 4, 7, 10, 20, 30 or 60). Our results show that learning of the sequence is still possible at large distances (60 filler items apart) and that the learning rate best fit a power law. Furthermore, the processing speed of the words in the repeated triplet is differentially affected by the distance between repetitions. These data thus provide novel constraints for current models of implicit statistical learning.

Indexed as

Memory traceSequence learningStatistical learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.