ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Application of the Double Wedge Resection Technique in the Correction of Labia Minora Hypertrophy Combined with Redundant Clitoral Hood.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundApproximately 30% of individuals with labia minora hypertrophy seeking plastic surgery consultation present concomitant redundant clitoral hood. This condition may lead to restricted local hygiene, recurrent frictional irritation, and diminished clitoral sensitivity. It is therefore necessary to explore a simplified surgical approach that can simultaneously address these multiple concerns.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 127 surgical patients clinically diagnosed with labia minora hypertrophy combined with redundant clitoral hood between January 2021 and January 2025. Based on their surgical technique, the patients were divided into a traditional wedge resection group and a double wedge resection group. Parameters compared between the two groups included operative time, blood loss, amount of local anesthetic used, female genital self-image scale (FGSIS) scores, degree of clitoral glans redundancy, as well as the incidence of complications.
resultsThe double wedge technique required longer operative time, more local anesthetic, and greater blood loss than the traditional wedge resection, with no significant difference in hospital stay. Both groups showed improved FGSIS scores postoperatively. Scores for all questionnaire items (except item 3) were higher in the double wedge group. The improvement in clitoral glans redundancy was significantly greater in the double wedge group (1.45 ± 0.34 vs 0.65 ± 0.45; T = 11.72, p < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly between groups.
conclusionThe double wedge resection technique is a straightforward procedure that improves both function and aesthetics of the labia minora and clitoral hood. With low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, it represents a safe and effective surgical option. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42420662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.