Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420641›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2026

Extracellular DNA Alters Detection of Subtle Bacterial Responses to Soil Rewetting.

H A Kittredge, K M Dougherty, Kathryn Glanville, Sarah E Evans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H A KittredgeDepartment of Integrative Biology, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, USA.
K M DoughertyDepartment of Integrative Biology, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, USA.
Kathryn GlanvilleDepartment of Integrative Biology, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8220-2922
Sarah E EvansDepartment of Integrative Biology, W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, 49060, USA. evanssa6@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6728-4499

Funding

Directorate for Biological Sciences DEB 2224712Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Station DE-SC0018409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities are often characterized using DNA-based sequencing, but these approaches also capture extracellular DNA (exDNA) released from dead cells, potentially altering inference about microbial responses to environmental change. This may be especially important during pulse disturbances, such as soil drying-rewetting, which can increase microbial mortality and transient necromass pools. We assessed whether exDNA altered inference about bacterial responses to drying-rewetting (an 80 mm simulated rainfall event following a 28-day drought) in conventionally tilled corn and perennial switchgrass soils. We quantified bacterial abundance (16 S rRNA gene copies), alpha diversity, and community composition in paired soil samples with exDNA included (+ exDNA) and in samples treated with propidium monoazide (PMAxx) to reduce amplification of exDNA (- exDNA). At our level of replication (n = 4), PMAxx treatment did not significantly alter overall temporal response patterns (i.e., no significant main effect of DNA treatment or DNA × time interaction). However, PMAxx treatment increased sensitivity to detect some pairwise temporal changes in bacterial abundance and community composition in corn soils following rewetting. exDNA pools were proportionally highest immediately after rewetting in corn soils, suggesting transient extracellular DNA may contribute to masking during disturbance recovery. In contrast, PMAxx treatment had comparatively small effects in switchgrass soils, which exhibited weaker temporal responses overall. Inclusion of exDNA also changed which taxa appeared most responsive to rewetting. Together, our results suggest that exDNA does not uniformly bias soil microbial inference, but may reduce detectability of subtle disturbance-driven shifts in certain soils. Future studies should advance knowledge of microbial turnover and necromass dynamics, particularly using multiple complementary methods, to help predict when exDNA is most likely to influence ecological inference.

Indexed as

BacteriaDNA, BacterialSoil MicrobiologyAzidesExtrachromosomal DNAPropidiumRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilZea maysAzidesDNA, BacterialExtrachromosomal DNAPropidiumpropidium monoazideRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilDrying-rewettingExtracellular DNANecromassPulse disturbanceSoil microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID42420641
PMCPMC13631144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.