ArticleAMB Express2026
Combination antifungal therapy against resistant C. albicans: efficacy and immune response in mice.
Article in AMB Express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study demonstrates the therapeutic effects of combination therapies against Candida albicans in mouse models, as opposed to mono-therapeutic treatments, while also comparing the pathogenicity of both sensitive and resistant strains. Fluconazole-resistant strain of Candida albicans was isolated from an infected patient, and its infectivity potential was compared with a susceptible strain by injecting a fungal cell suspension into the mice model. Additionally, the level of secretory interleukin 17 in the mice was examined. Furthermore, the efficacy of combination therapy was assessed using Fluconazole-Caspofungin (Flu-Cas) and Fluconazole-Amphotericin B (Flu-AmB) in comparison to monotherapy. The results indicate that the resistant strain exhibits higher pathogenicity compared to the susceptible strain in inducing systemic infection within the mouse model, as significant differences between the resistant and susceptible groups were observed at day 5 (p = 0.0401) and day 7 (p = 0.0182). The concentrations of IL-17 (pg/ml) on days 1 to 7 were 43.66 to 259 pg/ml, and 39.66 to 210 pg/ml in resistant and susceptible groups, respectively, which were only significant on days 5 (p = 0.0356) and 7 (p = 0.0280). Combination therapies using Flu-Cas and Flu-AmB demonstrated an effective reduction in fungal colonization after 17 days. This study demonstrates that Fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans strains are more pathogenic than susceptible ones in mice. Combination therapies with Fluconazole-Amphotericin B were most effective in reducing fungal colonization, outperforming monotherapy. These results support combination treatment for resistant Candida infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42420632What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.