Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420628›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

Proteomic characterization of SMARCA-deficient esophageal adenocarcinoma reveals complement evasion and DNA repair-associated prognostic subgroups.

Bastian Grothey, Max Krämer, Matteo Montalbano, Su Ir Lyu, Christiane J Bruns, Thomas Zander, Reinhard Büttner, Alexander Quaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bastian GrotheyInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. bastian.grothey@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0883-6481
Max KrämerDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Matteo MontalbanoInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Su Ir LyuInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christiane J BrunsDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6590-8181
Thomas ZanderDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8806-4786
Alexander QuaasInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3537-6011

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) INST 1856/71-1 FUGG
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is an aggressive malignancy in which the SWI/SNF catalytic subunits SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 are frequently lost, yet the biological and clinical impact of these deficiencies remains unclear.

methodsWe analysed 113 EAC specimens using mass spectrometry-based proteomics, including 89 SMARCA-deficient and 24 SMARCA-proficient tumours. Additional immunohistochemical studies were conducted on 98 cases. Differential expression, pathway enrichment, and survival analyses were used to characterise proteomic alterations and identify prognostic features.

resultsSMARCA-deficient tumours showed frequent expression of complement-inactivating proteins CD55 and CD59 with distinctive apical and membranous localisation. SMARCA4-deficient patients had significantly poorer survival than both SMARCA2-deficient and SMARCA-proficient patients. Among neoadjuvantly treated SMARCA-deficient tumours, coordinated upregulation of DNA repair proteins separated patients into two prognostic subgroups. The DNA repair-low subgroup had markedly worse survival than both the DNA repair-high subgroup and SMARCA-proficient controls, whereas the DNA repair-high subgroup showed a trend toward improved outcomes. This DNA repair-associated pattern was not observed in neoadjuvantly treated SMARCA-proficient tumours.

conclusionsSMARCA-deficient EAC comprises biologically distinct subgroups with prognostic proteomic signatures. CD55 and CD59 expression may contribute to resistance to antibody-based immunotherapies by complement evasion, while DNA repair profiles could guide post-surgical treatment in neoadjuvantly treated patients.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDNA HelicasesDNA RepairEsophageal NeoplasmsNuclear ProteinsTranscription FactorsAgedCD55 AntigensCD59 AntigensFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProteomicsCD55 AntigensCD59 AntigensDNA HelicasesNuclear ProteinsSMARCA2 protein, humanSMARCA4 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID42420628
PMCPMC13578737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.