Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420627›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Mitigating the slipping effect in polytomous scales: The Generalized Conditional Reliability Weighting (G-CRW) Algorithm and the WeightMyItems R package.

Abdullah Faruk Kılıç

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdullah Faruk KılıçDepartment of Educational Sciences, Division of Measurement and Evaluation in Education, Trakya University, İsmail Hakkı Tonguç Campus, 22030, Edirne, Türkiye. afarukkilic@trakya.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-1763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional unit weighting (UW) remains ubiquitous in psychological assessment due to its simplicity, yet it assumes equal item contribution and struggles with person-item response inconsistencies, commonly known as the slipping effect. This study introduces the Generalized Conditional Reliability Weighting (G-CRW) algorithm, a parsimonious scoring method for polytomous scales that conditionally incorporates item reliability into observed scores based on a person-item congruence threshold. To evaluate its psychometric performance relative to UW, a comprehensive Monte Carlo simulation (1134 conditions, 1000 replications) and an empirical application (N = 349) using three established scales (Doomscrolling, DASS-21, AAQ-II) were conducted. Simulation results demonstrated that G-CRW yields superior explained variance ratios (EVR) and internal consistency coefficients compared to UW, particularly under normal distributions and high average factor loadings (

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPsychometricsComputer SimulationFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansMonte Carlo MethodReproducibility of ResultsItem weightingMonte Carlo simulationPolytomous dataR packageScoring algorithm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.