ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Genetic and Morphological Diversity in Spontaneous Populations of Brassica rapa: How Do Feral Populations Differ From Wild Ones?
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Crop wild relatives are a valuable source of genetic material for improving cultivated crops. However, feral populations-self-sustaining plants that have escaped cultivation-are often mistaken for wild relatives because they exhibit traits such as seed dispersal and dormancy, which resemble wild forms and support persistence in natural habitats. This study examined the genetic diversity, population structure, and morphology of 117 Brassica rapa populations, including landraces from farms or genebanks and spontaneous populations sampled in the wild across the Mediterranean basin. Substantial genetic diversity was observed in the 45 wild populations from Italy and Algeria, with clear genetic differentiation from cultivated landraces. In contrast, spontaneous populations in France and Slovenia showed reduced diversity, comparable to that of landraces, and clustered closely with them in genetic analyses. Population trees and admixture analyses showed that the French spontaneous populations were more closely related to other landraces than to any other wild populations, which confirmed their feral origin. We also identified the most likely landrace ancestor for each feral population, which pointed towards a French landrace in nearly all cases. These findings support previous evidence that most European B. rapa populations are feral rather than truly wild. Morphological analyses further showed that feral populations displayed traits intermediate between wild and cultivated groups and even suggested some reversion towards pre-domestication traits in root morphology and germination. This highlights how feralisation can blur distinctions between wild relatives and crop escapes. Overall, the study emphasizes the need to disentangle wild and feral populations when identifying genetic resources for breeding. Further research is required to clarify the history of feralisation in B. rapa, including the origins and spread of populations, gene flow with crops and wild relatives, and the role of local adaptation in shaping their persistence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.