ArticleMolecular neurobiology2026
Subcellular Localization of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Regulates Gene-Specific Modulation of Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Neuronal Cells.
Article in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) exhibits non-canonical neuroprotective functions; its overexpression protects against hypoxic-ischemic brain injury and preserves mitochondrial function. Here, we identified a novel phenomenon in an in vitro model in which oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation induced a phase-dependent redistribution of endogenous TERT in HT22 neuronal cells, characterized by early mitochondrial accumulation followed by predominant nuclear localization. We aimed to determine whether subcellular localization of TERT dictates its functional specificity in regulating the copy number of mitochondrial DNA-encoded genes in neurons. HT22 cells expressing TERT, targeted to either the mitochondria (mito-TERT) or nucleus (nuc-TERT), were generated using adenoviral transfection. Subcellular localization was confirmed using western blotting. Mitochondrial DNA copy number was assessed using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and direct mito-TERT binding was assessed using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR; ND1 and ND2 mRNA levels were measured using qRT-PCR. Both nuc-TERT and mito-TERT models were successfully established. qPCR analysis showed that mito-TERT specifically upregulated the copy number of mitochondrial complex I genes (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-hydrogen dehydrogenase subunit [ND]1/2), whereas nuc-TERT broadly upregulated genes across complexes I, III, IV, and V. A regulation specificity index showed that mito-TERT selectively enhanced ND1 copy number. ChIP-qPCR confirmed mito-TERT enrichment at the ND1 and ND2 promoters. Together, these findings demonstrate that TERT regulates mitochondrial DNA copy number through distinct, compartment-dependent mechanisms. Mito-TERT exhibited gene-specific regulation via direct promoter binding, whereas nuc-TERT displayed broader effects. The stress-induced redistribution of TERT and these mechanistic insights reveal a novel paradigm for multiphasic TERT-mediated neuroprotection in brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42420567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.