Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420547›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026

Perspectives of the Association of Academic Neonatology Division Directors on the American Board of Pediatrics recommendations for training in neonatal-perinatal medicine.

P J McNamara, D O'Reilly, M Good

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P J McNamaraUniversity of Iowa Stead Family Children's Hospital, Iowa City, IO, USA. patrick-mcnamara@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-8872
D O'ReillyUniversity of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7297-8441
M GoodUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recommendations from the American Board of Pediatrics propose a two-year fellowship for Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. A survey of members of the Association of Academic Neonatology Division Directors was conducted to gather perspectives on the recommendations. A minority of respondents were supportive of 2-year fellowships. Although there may be some financial benefit by transitioning to a faculty salary earlier, risk of burnout, attrition of the academic and physician scientist pipeline, and curtailing innovation and discovery were cited as major concerns. Division directors are supportive of enhancing clinical exposure, transition to competency-based assessment, and the creation of trainee pathways within 3-year fellowships.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsNeonatologyPediatricsPerinatologyAcademiaHumansSocieties, MedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42420547
PMCPMC13473011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.