ArticleScientific reports2026
Cloud attenuation estimation based on cloud particle sensor sonde observations for next-generation satellite communications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cloud attenuation due to cloud particles can be a critical issue for next-generation sub-terahertz (sub-THz), terahertz (THz), and free-space optical (FSO) satellite communications. Accurate estimation of cloud attenuation under various cloud conditions is essential for the design of satellite communication systems; accordingly, numerous cloud attenuation estimation models have been proposed. The widely used ITU-R model proposed up to 200 GHz is based on liquid water content and does not explicitly consider ice crystals. Previous studies have often assumed water droplets to be dominant, potentially leading to unrealistic cloud attenuation estimates, especially in multilayered cloud systems where ice crystals can exist over a wide temperature range. In addition, approaches based on reanalysis data and numerical weather prediction models rely on parameterized cloud representations and may involve substantial uncertainties. These limitations highlight the need for observationally grounded evaluations that explicitly account for both water droplets and ice crystals. In this study, cloud attenuation was estimated up to wavelengths of approximately 20 [Formula: see text] (corresponding to about 10 THz) using ten cloud microphysical data obtained from cloud particle sensor (CPS) sondes observed in Okinawa, Japan, during the Baiu (East Asia rainy season) in 2016, 2017, and 2025. CPS sondes enable the vertical measurement of the number of cloud particles along the sonde flight path and allow for their rough classification into water droplets and ice crystals, making them particularly well-suited to addressing the aforementioned challenges. Cloud attenuation was estimated based on in situ observational data obtained using CPS sondes. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to estimate cloud attenuation for satellite communications using in situ observational data of cloud particles. The results demonstrate that cloud attenuation due to ice crystals becomes dominant, particularly at wavelengths shorter than 1.0 mm, challenging the conventional picture that cloud attenuation is dominated by water droplets. This finding was obtained by explicitly considering the size distribution of ice crystals. A key contribution of this study is the identification of limitations in conventional cloud attenuation models for satellite communications using in situ cloud particle observations. Expanding similar studies globally could lead to the development of more accurate and widely applicable cloud attenuation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.