ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Fludarabine combined with treosulfan or total body irradiation as a conditioning therapy before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A retrospective matched-pair analysis from the ALWP of the EBMT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are very limited data on treosulfan (Treo)-based conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We aimed to compare fludarabine with Treo (FluTreo) or total body irradiation (FluTBI) in this setting. The final matched-pair analysis included ALL patients transplanted in complete remission after FluTreo (n = 153) or FluTBI (n = 431). The median patient age was 56.5 and 54.1 years, respectively. The allograft was derived from an unrelated (54.2% in FluTreo and 52% FluTBI group), matched sibling (30.7% and 32.5%) or haploidentical donor (15% and 15.5%). The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade II-IV was 26.6% in the FluTreo and 30% in the FluTBI group (p = 0.43). The 2-year incidence of chronic GVHD was 33.5% and 40.7%, respectively (p = 0.23). The 2-year incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 28.1% and 25.6% in the FluTreo and 25.1% and 20.4%, respectively, in the FluTBI group (p = 0.15 and p = 0.38). Leukemia-free survival and overall survival was 46.2% and 55% in the FluTreo and 54.5% and 61.3%, respectively, in the FluTBI group (p = 0.1 and p = 0.22). GVHD-free and relapse-free survival was 33.7% and 40.8%, respectively, in FluTreo and FluTBI patients (p = 0.06). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in transplant outcomes between the studied groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.