Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effect of virtual reality on spatial-anatomical understanding in preoperative liver surgery: a randomized crossover study.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise spatial understanding of complex anatomy is critical for preoperative planning in hepatobiliary surgery. Traditional CT and MRI imaging require mental reconstruction of anatomy from 2D slices, imposing substantial cognitive load. Although 3D reconstructions improve spatial understanding, they are typically displayed on 2D screens, limiting true depth perception. Virtual Reality (VR) visualization offers both stereoscopic depth and embodied interaction to improve spatial-anatomical understanding, yet its quantitative advantage over standard desktop visualization remains uncertain, especially regarding task complexity. In this randomized crossover study, 58 medical students analyzed 3D liver models of varying complexity using both VR and desktop visualization. Performance on lesion/vessel relations and lesion segment allocation tasks served as a measure of spatial-anatomical understanding, while visuospatial ability was assessed with the Mental Rotations Test. In complex models, VR significantly improved performance compared with desktop visualization (28.0 ± 3.3 vs. 26.4 ± 3.6; p = 0.002, d = 0.46), whereas results for simpler models were comparable. The VR advantage scaled with task complexity and correlated with higher visuospatial ability (r = 0.31, p = 0.018). These findings indicate that VR is associated with measurable advantages under higher task complexity, supporting its potential role in surgical education and preoperative planning, although the present design cannot isolate which immersive features drive this benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.