ArticleScientific reports2026
Comparative evaluation of domain-specific and general-purpose transformer models for Arabic poet classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arabic poet classification presents distinctive challenges stemming from the morphological richness and stylistic diversity inherent in both classical and modern Arabic verse. This study conducts an extensive comparative evaluation of several neural language models to assess their ability to represent poetic expression and capture authorial characteristics. Two carefully curated datasets are utilised: FrequentPoets, representing prolific authors with extensive verse collections, and CrossEraPoets, encompassing poets from distinct historical periods to examine temporal stylistic variation. A comparative evaluation framework is introduced to contrast domain-specific and general-purpose language models across prolific authorship and cross-era stylistic variation. The domain-adapted AraPoemBERT consistently achieves superior performance, attaining 73.11% accuracy (73.00% F1) on FrequentPoets and 77.06% accuracy (77.04% F1) on CrossEraPoets, whereas the general-purpose GPT-4o demonstrates considerably lower performance under zero-shot and few-shot evaluation settings. The results highlight the significance of domain-adapted pretraining for morphologically complex languages like Arabic and suggest the potential advantage of transformer-based architectures in modelling stylistic and linguistic nuances unique to Arabic verse. These findings also suggest that temporal diversity may play an important role in model generalisation across different poetic styles. The study contributes to Arabic Natural Language Processing (NLP) and digital humanities by enabling computational authorship attribution, stylistic analysis, and cross-historical exploration of Arabic literary heritage. Overall, the proposed framework provides a robust foundation for future research in Arabic poetry analytics and domain-specific language modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.