Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420339›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Population-scale network embeddings expose educational divides in network structure related to right-wing populist voting.

Malte Lüken, Javier Garcia-Bernardo, Sreeparna Deb, Flavio Hafner, Megha Khosla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Malte LükenNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.luken@esciencecenter.nl.
Javier Garcia-BernardoODISSEI Social Data Science Team, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sreeparna DebDepartment of Software Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Flavio HafnerNetherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Megha KhoslaDepartment of Intelligent Systems, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek VI.Veni.231S.148ODISSEI 184.035.014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Administrative registry data can be used to construct population-scale networks whose ties reflect shared social contexts between persons. With machine learning, such networks can be encoded into numerical representations-embeddings-that automatically capture an individual's position within the network. We created embeddings for all persons in the Dutch population from a population-scale network that represents five shared contexts: neighborhood, work, family, household, and school. To assess the informativeness of these embeddings, we used them to predict right-wing populist voting. Embeddings alone predicted right-wing populist voting above chance-level but performed worse than individual characteristics. Combining the best subset of embeddings with individual characteristics only slightly improved predictions. After transforming the embeddings to make their dimensions more sparse and orthogonal, we found that one embedding dimension was strongly associated with the outcome. Mapping this dimension back to the population network revealed that differences in educational ties and attainment corresponded to distinct network structures associated with right-wing populist voting. Our study contributes methodologically by demonstrating how population-scale network embeddings can be made interpretable, and substantively by linking structural network differences in education to right-wing populist voting.

Identifiers

PMID42420339
PMCPMC13645627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.