ArticleNature communications2026
Pulmonary mRNA-LNP vaccines for rapid and durable protection against bacterial infection.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary bacterial infections remain a major clinical challenge. Although vaccination reduces infection rates and mortality, the vulnerable post-vaccination immunity gap can still result in infection and vaccine failure. In addition, effective vaccines are unavailable for many clinically important bacterial pathogens. Here, we report a pulmonary mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP) vaccine incorporating an ionizable lipid engineered for localized high-level expression, which elicits both rapid and durable protection against bacterial lung infections in female mice, effectively bridging this critical window of vulnerability. Intratracheal delivery of mRNA-LNP rapidly primes lung neutrophils and macrophages into a transcriptionally pre-activated state, enhancing their phagocytic activity and enabling rapid, antigen-independent bacterial clearance during the early post-vaccination period (approximately 1-7 days). Subsequently, vaccination induces potent antigen-specific adaptive responses, conferring sustained protection against both laboratory and clinical drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Single-cell transcriptomics and immune profiling reveal coordinated activation of innate and adaptive immune programs. This dual-phase immune response exemplifies a paradigm-shifting vaccine design that integrates innate and adaptive immunity to confer both immediate and long-term protection. Our findings establish a mechanistic basis for rapid antibacterial defense and highlight pulmonary mRNA-LNP vaccination as a promising strategy for combating respiratory infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.