Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42420187›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2026

Clinical Scales and Wearable Sensors in Patients with Essential Tremor Treated with Deep Brain Stimulation.

Elena Jiltsova, Anna Hauffman, Dag Nyholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena JiltsovaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6675-7532
Anna HauffmanDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-6209
Dag NyholmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Neurology, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9776-7715

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) for essential tremor (ET) is commonly evaluated using tremor scales, which capture only snapshot of symptoms and miss daily variability. Wearable sensors enable objective monitoring and may offer complementary information to support clinical decisions.

objectivesTo investigate whether continuous wearable monitoring provides additional information to traditional analysis in ET.

methodsForty-five patients with ET undergoing DBS were assessed preoperatively and 9-12 months postoperatively using TETRAS scale, the EQ-5D-3L, and the Personal KinetiGraph (PKG) which quantified percentage time with tremor (PTT). Pre- and postoperative measures were compared and correlated.

resultsDBS significantly improved outcomes: median TETRAS scores decreased by 55% and PKG PTT by 59%. Individual responses varied, and TETRAS and PTT showed week correlation, indicating that instruments capture different aspects of the disorder.

conclusionsCombining clinical scales with wearable monitoring complements traditional assessments by capturing daily tremor fluctuations and supporting optimized DBS management.

Indexed as

ambulatory monitoringdeep brain stimulationessential tremortremor assessmentwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42420187
PMCPMC13346013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.