ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2026
Elimination of the Opioid Sliding Scale Is Associated with Improved Opioid Stewardship Metrics.
Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHospitals traditionally use an opioid sliding scale, prescribing lower doses for pain scores of 4-6 and higher doses for pain score 7-10. The authors hypothesized that elimination of the opioid sliding scale and implementation of additional electronic health record (EHR) "nudges" could improve adoption of best practices and improve opioid stewardship metrics.
methodsFocus groups with key stakeholders were employed to design, implement, and evaluate the intervention. The intervention used the EHR to eliminate the conventional opioid sliding scale with a novel order set favoring non-opioids and setting a new single threshold for opioid administration (pain score of 5-10). Baseline and postintervention data for inpatients with hospital stay ≤ 30 days were extracted from the medical record. Subanalysis was performed for patients undergoing at least one operative procedure. Mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered and prescribed at discharge were compared using analysis of variance.
resultsThis multicenter study included 60,464 inpatients for the baseline and postintervention time periods. Interventions were associated with a 31.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.3%-36.5%) reduction in the mean inpatient MME administered and a 12.4% (95% CI 6.7%-18.3%) reduction in the mean MME prescribed. For the subset of patients who underwent an operative procedure (22.6% of the cohort), there was a 37.3% (95% CI 31.0%-43.7%) reduction in the mean inpatient MME administered and 12.1% (95% CI 8.3%-15.9%) reduction in MME prescribed.
conclusionElimination of the conventional opioid sliding scale and other EHR "nudges" have the potential to reduce opioids administered. These findings support safe pain management practices and demonstrate a scalable model for health system opioid stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.