Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42419902›Full record

ArticleWomen's health nursing (Seoul, Korea)2026

Research trends in educational interventions for digital sexual media literacy among adolescents: a scoping review (2015-2025).

Gayoung Kim, Hae Won Kim

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health nursing (Seoul, Korea), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gayoung KimCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Hae Won KimCollege of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review analyzed research trends and the effectiveness of sexual media literacy educational interventions for adolescents and provided foundational evidence for developing effective programs.

methodsGuided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework, ten databases were systematically searched for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Studies involving adolescents and individuals who educate or mediate adolescents' media use were included. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts, yielding a final sample of 11 studies.

resultsThe included studies predominantly targeted middle school students, and the theory of planned behavior was the most commonly applied theoretical framework. Most programs (81.8%) emphasized strengthening adolescents' ability to interpret sexual content in media. Program duration ranged from 1 to 10 sessions, with total instructional time ranging from 90 minutes to 18 hours. Reported outcomes included improvements in sexual media literacy (72.7%), knowledge (36.4%), attitude (54.5%), behavior (45.5%), belief (18.2%), and interpersonal process (36.4%). The main teaching methods were lecture-based delivery (63.6%), offline interactive activities (63.6%), and web-based programs (36.4%). Overall, the programs improved adolescents' sexual media literacy, sexual health outcomes, and sexual health-related communication skills.

conclusionThis review provides evidence that sexual media literacy programs can improve adolescents' media interpretation skills and sexual health-related outcomes. Integrating learner-centered approaches with media-based instruction may be particularly useful and has meaningful implications for developing tailored sexual media literacy programs for adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorDigital MediaHealth LiteracySex EducationSexual BehaviorAdolescentHumansMedia ExposureAdolescentInformation literacyMass mediaScoping reviewSex education

Identifiers

PMID42419902
PMCPMC13346788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.