ArticleBMJ open2026
Safety and early efficacy of iPSC-derived motor neuron progenitor cells in subacute spinal cord injury: protocol for a phase I, multicentre, open-label, single-arm trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06976229 (A Phase I Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Human Allogeneic Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Human Allogeneic Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC)-Derived Motor Neuron Progenitor Cells (XS228 Cell Injection) in Patients With Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal cord injury (SCI) frequently results in severe neurological impairment due to neural tissue destruction and scarring, representing a substantial and increasing global health burden. Current standard treatments primarily focus on preventing secondary complications but offer limited efficacy in repairing neural circuits or reversing neurological deficits. Stem cell transplantation, particularly using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived therapies, presents a regenerative strategy that avoids the ethical constraints associated with embryonic stem cells while providing a scalable source for cellular therapeutics. Specifically, allogeneic, 'off-the-shelf' iPSC-derived motor neuron progenitors offer a standardised and scalable approach, supported by a dual therapeutic mechanism observed in preclinical models. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm clinical study involving 12-24 adult patients with subacute SCI. To evaluate safety and tolerability, the trial is structured into sequential Single Ascending Dose (SAD; n=6-12) and Multiple Ascending Dose (MAD; n=6-12) phases. Both phases employ a standard '3+3' dose-escalation design across two dose levels (level 1: 5×10⁷ cells/dose; level 2: 1.5×10⁸ cells/dose). Participants in the SAD phase receive a single intrathecal administration, whereas those in the MAD phase receive four biweekly intrathecal administrations. Dose escalation, cohort expansion and progression from the SAD to the MAD phase are strictly contingent on the absence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) over a 28-day observation window following the single dose (SAD) or the final dose (MAD). The primary endpoint is to determine the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs, identify DLTs and establish the maximum tolerated dose as well as the recommended phase II dose. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating longitudinal changes in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale grade, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) sensory/motor scores and Spinal Cord Independence Measure score at predefined follow-up visits (days 29, 71, 90, 180, 270 and 360) up to 360 days post-baseline. Exploratory objectives include characterising the potential therapeutic mechanisms and broader clinical impact through longitudinal assessment of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, neurophysiological function, bladder outcomes and spinal cord imaging metrics. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committees of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Approval No. YW2025-012-01) and the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University (Approval No. 2025-071-2). Furthermore, the investigational product has secured regulatory clearance for clinical trials from both the China National Medical Products Administration (Clinical Trial Notification No. 2025LP01101) and the US Food and Drug Administration (IND No. 31234). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before participation. Moreover, strict adherence will be maintained to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines throughout the study. To ensure transparency and broad dissemination, the study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06976229.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.