ArticleBMJ open2026
National qualitative study in France to explore parents' lived experience at the birth of a child with a large or giant congenital melanocytic nevus.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCongenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) are congenital malformations that cannot be detected by prenatal ultrasounds and may have a significant physical and psychological impact on affected individuals, particularly when they are large. Congenital anomalies are known to impair parental quality of life, which may in turn affect the child's well-being and development. However, little is known about the feelings and lived experience of parents on the birth of a CMN-affected child.The aim of this study is to describe the lived experience of parents of a child with a large or giant CMN, and to document the expressed needs for support (psychological, marital, parenting-related and those evolving along the care pathway) METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a qualitative study in 10 French hospitals, based on semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants will be parents of children under 18 years of age with a large or giant CMN. A maximum variation sampling strategy will be applied to ensure optimal diversity of profiles in terms of children's age, gender and phototype and location and size of the CMN. The target sample size will be determined by theoretical saturation. Data will be analysed using an inductive thematic content analysis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Nancy University Hospital (NUH) Ethics Committee (Opinion No. 504) and authorisation from the French
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.