ArticleBone & joint research2026
Persistent bone and muscle deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction : implications for post-traumatic osteoarthritis risk.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with persistent strength deficits and thigh muscle atrophy, which may contribute to post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Other potential musculoskeletal alterations, such as changes in bone morphology and mechanical properties, are less well understood. No study has comprehensively examined multi-tissue deficits post-ACLR, limiting insight into potential structural contributors to long-term joint vulnerability. Consequently, this cross-sectional study investigated differences in muscle size and quality, bone morphology, and mechanical properties between the ACLR and contralateral uninjured leg. The influence of leg dominance on musculoskeletal outcomes in a control population and the identification of distinct recovery profiles in the ACLR group were explored. Methods: A total of 32 individuals with a history of ACLR (1 to 6 years post-surgery) and 32 matched uninjured controls underwent peripheral quantitative computerised tomography at the shank (66% tibial length) and thigh (20% and 50% femoral length). Outcomes included muscle cross-sectional area, muscle density, subcutaneous fat, cortical and trabecular bone area and density, and bone resistance to bending, torsion, and compression. Clustering techniques were applied to explore potential high- and low-recovery profiles. Results: The ACLR leg demonstrated reduced muscle size and density, smaller cortical bone area, lower trabecular density, and impaired resistance to bending and compressive forces in comparison to the uninjured contralateral leg. Clustering revealed a low-recovery profile in 69% of ACLR participants, characterized by widespread musculoskeletal deficits. Conclusion: Persistent musculoskeletal alterations after ACLR may reflect compromised structural integrity associated with PTOA risk. Recovery profiling may help identify those at greatest risk, informing targeted interventions to improve long-term joint health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.