ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026
Context-Aware Multilevel Classification of Semantic Relations in Drug-Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) Networks-Predicting Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) as a Case Study.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major concern for public health and patient safety and a burden in drug discovery, with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) as a prototypical case. Next to computational models such as deep learning, knowledge graph models can help capture biological systems and pathways underlying toxic effects. We present a hierarchical, context-aware knowledge graph model to detect ADRs, with DILI as a case study. The model builds on a commercial knowledge graph integrating over 200 life-science databases and millions of publications and patents. It combines translation- and path-based methods, where two-hop paths link drugs and ADRs via an intermediate concept (e.g., genes, proteins, pathways). These paths are combined in path bundles as the graph's basic units. Evaluation used the FDA DILIrank data set of DILI-positive and DILI-negative drugs, mapped onto the graph. Performance was evaluated with classification metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The output probabilities of the path bundles generated by base classifiers formed the input for multilevel statistical modeling. Multilevel analysis was used to predict DILI risk of the drugs while accounting for the dependencies of the path bundles on the ADR contexts and on the different relations in the graph. The four-level model performed best (AUC = 0.850; MCC = 0.639). Average prediction probabilities showed good separation (0.641 for DILI-positive drugs and 0.402 for DILI-negative drugs). Additional results included the correct classification of 29 of the 37 wrongly classified drugs by a QSAR study using molecular descriptors. The added value of a cascaded QSAR and knowledge graph approach was shown on a 130-compound subset of the DeepDILI test set, where the combined model rescued additional DILI-positive drugs missed by DeepDILI alone at the expense of a limited number of false positives. The study model and data are available through https://github.com/mi-erasmusmc/multilevel_dili.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.